| Variable | Adjusteda | ||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Model diagnostics | |
| Model 1 |
|
|
|
| Self-efficacy | 0.08*** | 0.06, 0.12 | Pseudos r-square (negelkerke) = 14% |
| −2log likelihood chi-square = 36.3*** | |||
| Goodness of fit chi-square = 251.2b | |||
| Model 2 | |||
| System support | 0.06*** | 0.01, 0.10 | Pseudos r-square (negelkerke) = 7% |
| −2log likelihood chi-square = 16.9** | |||
| Goodness of fit chi-square = 239.6b | |||
| Model 3 | |||
| Professional role resistant/fear of offence | −0.03* | −0.07, −0.001 | Pseudos r-square (negelkerke) = 6% |
| −2log likelihood chi-square = 13.5* | |||
| Goodness of fit chi-square = 331.3b | |||
| Model 4 | |||
| Provider safety | 0.06* | 0.03, 0.13 | Pseudos r-square (negelkerke) = 6% |
| −2log likelihood chi-square = 13.5* | |||
| Goodness of fit chi-square = 215.6b | |||
| Model 5 | |||
| Victim safety | 0.10** | 0.04, 0.16 | Pseudos r-square (negelkerke) = 9% |
| −2log likelihood chi-square = 21.1** | |||
| Goodness of fit chi-square = 250.7b | |||